Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alexis Canter vs Iancu-Lustinian Ghinda Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Canter vs Ghinda analysis and find out who is favored!
Alexis Canter vs Iancu-Lustinian Ghinda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Canter 1 - 0 Ghinda
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Canter has won 53.87% of points on their second serve, while Ghinda has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Canter, in recent form, has won 47.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ghinda has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.36% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Canter has saved 60.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ghinda has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Canter has won 47.06% of matches played (W/L 16/ 18), with Ghinda winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Canter has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 132/ 110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8). Ghinda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 20/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 12/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Canter has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.48% of matches (W/L 16/ 17), where as Ghinda has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Canter winning 1 times and Ghinda being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Canter winning 2 and Ghinda winning 0. The last match between Canter and Ghinda was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 24-02-2020, Q2 round, Hard with Alexis Canter getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Canter and Ghinda have played a deciding set 0 times, with Canter winning 0 times and Ghinda 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Canter winning 1, and Ghinda 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Canter has played against opponents with an average rank of 86.56 while Ghinda has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Canter has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ghinda has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Canter has converted 62.07% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ghinda has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
886
Rank
773
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
51% (186-177)
Career Total W/L
41% (57-81)
56% (9-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Alexis Canter vs Iancu-Lustinian Ghinda For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Canter VS Ghinda
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Alexis Canter | Iancu-Lustinian Ghinda |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alexis Canter | Iancu-Lustinian Ghinda |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (20/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (191/172) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 68 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.06 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 11 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:53 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 67.38 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (609/919) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (440/609) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (167/310) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 62% (36/58) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (306/858) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (9/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Alexis Canter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Charles Broom
Player
Alexis Canter
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Harry Wendelken
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Zechariah Hamrouni
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Sean Hodkin
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Alexis Canter
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
59
Total Points Won
55
|
6-7(5) 6-4 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
James Beaven
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Alexis Canter
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Carlo Alberto Fossati
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Thomas Mathys
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oscar Lacides
Player
Alexis Canter
45%
(
27 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Iancu-Lustinian Ghinda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jan Pleva
Player
Iancu-Lustinian Ghinda
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Seita Watanabe
Player
Iancu-Lustinian Ghinda
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
39%
(
15 of
38)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Piotr Grynkowski
Player
Iancu-Lustinian Ghinda
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Canter Vs Ghinda Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Canter are available here and Ghinda photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
